

EZEKIEL 25 17
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you.
"OPERATION FREEASIA" LINKS
http://adventuremanproductions.8k.com
http://asiahilltribechurch.8k.com
http://whitewatersecurity.8k.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPWARD AND ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS

DEVIL WATCH-RED ALERT-BE ADVISED-
INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FANATIC CULTS WORLDWIDE
ARE CONVERTING REMOTE POOR INNOCENT IGNORANT ETHNIC MINORITIES
RESIST THEM-CALL AUTHORITIES-TELL COMMUNITIES TO BEWARE-PASS THE WORD
THE DEVIL IS IN TOWN KNOCKING AT YOUR DOOR-THIS INFORMATION WILL IDENTIFY THEM FOR YOU.
JW ARE BAD PLEASE SEE VIDEOS OF INVESTIGATIONS ON JW BELOW=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p29dPfbrTuQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSZRIhsuTE8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVg3_AMnGVM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D61Lnpwgcyo&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HugBxoNxP5s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2w8PyT1YZYA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9qXyMEf7io&feature=related
Read Paul & Pat Blizard’s story: “They Wanted our Baby to Die!”
Of all items listed, only three have been
discontinued. (highlighted in Yellow) All are listed,
to show the absurdity of Watchtower rules and the absolute control
leadership
has over the lives of members once they join.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
At least 20 Chinese Protestants have been detained as they tried to gather for an Easter service in Beijing. The worshippers, from the Shouwang church, were trying to hold an outdoor service because are prevented from using their own premises. Police have recently arrested dozens of people from the church. The authorities have also been carrying out a wider suppression of dissent - harassing foreign reporters and detaining lawyers and activists. The most high-profile detainee, artist Ai Weiwei, was taken by police as he tried to board a flight earlier this month. His family say they do not know where he is, whether he has been charged with an offence, or even whether he has been formally arrested. Round-ups-China's constitution guarantees freedom of religion, but the Communist Party tries to control where people worship.
There are an estimated 70 million Christians in the country, about 20 million of whom attend government-approved churches. The rest worship with unregistered groups known as "house" churches. Such groups are broadly tolerated, but Shouwang leaders have annoyed the authorities in recent weeks by insisting on trying to hold services in the open. Shouwang is one of Beijing's biggest so-called underground Churches, with over 1,000 members. Christians in Beijing says police personnel were on every street corner in the area where the worshippers were due to meet on Sunday morning. Authorities rounded up anyone suspected of being a member of the Shouwang church and loaded them on to buses to be driven to police stations.
One of the church's leaders Jin Tianming, who is under house arrest, said that between 20 and 30 members had been detained. He said they had been taken to several different police stations. About 100 Shouwang members were held earlier this month, and 12 of its leaders are under house arrest. Bob Fu, of the US-based Christian China Aid Association, says the crackdown on Christian worship is wider than Beijing. He says churchgoers in the southern city of Guangzhou have been refused permission to hold Easter services, and Christians in the northern city of Hohhot are facing repression. "There is a very large house church in Hohhot. They were also under crackdown. More than a dozen of the leaders are now under criminal detention," said Mr Fu, who is a critic of Beijing's religious policies. The communist authorities have not yet commented on the latest detentions. last week the communists banned all public religious ceremonies in public. China bans all religions being an athiest communist dictator army controlled state. The Falun Gong is chinas main enemy-christians muslims next.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
April 16, 2011
In a mass police action, Beijing authorities on Saturday detained at least two pastors of the Beijing house church that tried to worship outdoors last weekend and have put all its lay leaders under house arrest, church sources told ChinaAid. Meanwhile, many members of the Shouwang Church, one of Beijing’s largest house churches with about 1,000 members, have been forced out of their homes by landlords who have come under intense pressure to evict them, and others have been fired from their jobs for worshipping at Shouwang Church, according to a church leader. ChinaAid Association calls on evangelical organizations worldwide, including the World Evangelical Alliance and the National Association for Evangelicals, to speak up on behalf of these persecuted believers. “This is a critical time for global church leaders like WEA and NAE to speak up for fellow brothers and sisters in China,” said ChinaAid founder and president Bob Fu.
“God and his persecuted church will hold us accountable if we keep silent when we know clearly what we can and should do for our persecuted body of Christ. We urge the Chinese government to exercise restraint and refrain from using violence that would further escalate the conflict with peaceful Shouwang worshippers who ask for nothing more than simply to exercise their right to religious freedom.” Senior Pastor Jin Tianming, who founded Shouwang Church in the 1990s, was taken away by officers of the Public Security Bureau at 8 p.m. His whereabouts are unknown. Another pastor, Li Xiaobai, and Li’s wife were also taken away by Public Security officers. The couple had been the longest-held following last Sunday’s attempt at outdoor worship, and were not released until Tuesday. The church’s other two pastors and all its elders and deacons are now under house arrest.
The church has made clear its intention of continuing to worship outdoors this Sunday at the same location in western Beijing’s Haidian district. Hundreds of church members turned up at the designated outdoor meeting site last Sunday only to be confronted with more than 300 police officers who rounded up at least 169 people, herded them onto buses and detained them for hours in police stations and a nearby elementary school, where they were interrogated and fingerprinted. One of the most recent prayer requests distributed by the church leadership to its members says, “Pray for our dear brothers and sisters …. May God give everyone an extra measure of strength! And may God have mercy on those in authority, to soften their hearts, so that they do not misuse the authority given them by God to oppress the people. “Tomorrow is Sunday again. We are still under house arrest, and I expect that many others also will not be allowed to leave their homes. For those brothers and sisters who will be able to go out, who knows what will await them. We earnestly seek God’s protection for them!”
Shouwang Church made the controversial decision to meet outdoors after being evicted from its latest indoor meeting place, leased premises in a restaurant. The church in November 2009 had met outdoors twice, once in the midst of an early winter snowstorm, when it was unable to take possession of one floor of a building it had purchased for more than $4 million because the seller, under pressure from the government, refused to hand over the keys. In the face of that continued stalemate and unable to find an alternative meeting site large enough for its growing congregation, Shouwang leaders decided that meeting outdoors was the only choice. Their move has garnered the support of other large house churches in the capital, which further heightens the stakes in this church-state standoff. On Friday, at least 14 other large house churches in Beijing, all members of the Beijing Ministerial Prayer Fellowship, issued a statement saying they are holding a weekly prayer vigil for Shouwang.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
The days leading up to Easter are always a sombre time for Christians. But this year in Beijing, many believers have the added concern of not knowing if or where they’ll be allowed to celebrate the holiest day of the year on the Christian calendar. Nearly 50 members of one of Beijing’s largest Protestant house churches, including its two pastors, were detained and hundreds of police were deployed in a commercial district in the northwest of the city in order to prevent the congregation from holding an outdoor Palm Sunday service. The leaders of the Shouwang church said they would nonetheless try again next week – Easter Sunday – unless they are given permission to celebrate the mass indoors at their usual premises. Only officially sanctioned churches are considered legal in China. In practice, however, semi-underground “house churches” – so named because they are not allowed to own property and instead often gather in private homes – have been widely tolerated and allowed to flourish in recent years. The house church movement now has an estimated 60 million members, compared with 20 million who belong to the official organizations, the Three-Self Patriotic Movement for Protestants and the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association for Catholics.
Sunday marked the second straight week that police prevented members of the Shouwang church from praying in a public location. The church, which has about 1,000 followers, said it was forced to hold the services outside after being evicted from the restaurant where they gathered every Sunday for more than a year. Shouwang’s leaders say the restaurant had been under official pressure to close its doors to the church, and claimed other prospective locations had refused their rent money for the same reason. “It was a sleepless night. I pray for those [church members] who went outside today,” said one member of the Shouwang congregation who was kept under house arrest Sunday. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, he said the church would try again to hold an outdoor service on Easter Sunday. “This won’t stop until we have an indoor site for congregation.” Meanwhile, the leader of another prominent Beijing house church told The Globe and Mail he has been under regular surveillance and an off-and-on informal house arrest for most of the past two months.
The pressure on Shouwang and other house churches coincides with a harsh crackdown on political dissent in the country that has seen dozens of prominent activists, artists and human-rights lawyers detained, in most cases without any public explanation. Liu Fenggang, pastor of the smaller Sheng Ai house church, said the two campaigns were linked by the government’s fear of a Middle East-style uprising happening in China after anonymous calls to stage a “jasmine revolution” in the country circulated online earlier this year. “This crackdown against Shouwang is completely connected to the ‘colour revolutions’ in the Arab world,” the 52-year-old Mr. Liu said in an interview. “There’s no relationship between the jasmine revolution and the church. But the government has this fear and they’re trying to protect their power.” Mr. Liu said he had been barred from leaving his home each Sunday since January, when it first became clear that the protests in Tunisia, Egypt and elsewhere posed a genuine threat to the authoritarian governments in those countries.
Mosques became a key rallying point for anti-regime activists in the Middle East, with Fridays – the Muslim holy day – often seeing the largest demonstrations as protesters took to the streets after prayer. The online calls for a similar uprising in China appealed for people to protest in Beijing and other cities each Sunday. The Communist Party-run Global Times newspaper has portrayed the Shouwang dispute as a law-and-order issue, and warned believers not to politicize it. “Chinese society attaches great importance to harmony, and those with religious beliefs should adhere even more strongly to this harmony,” read an editorial published last week. “They should not cause any public disturbances through their own religious activities which will put them at odds with society.” On Sunday, the area in Beijing’s Zhongguancun neighbourhood chosen for the Shouwang congregation’s outdoor service was taped off and flooded with uniformed and plainclothes police officers for a second straight week. Shouwang’s leaders tried in 2006 to register with the government, but were rejected because they refused to join one of the official organizations, which are seen as filtering the message delivered by member churches. “I believe only Jesus is my saviour,” said Peter Wu, a 52-year-old attendee of a Beijing house church. “In China, the Communist Party demands to be above Jesus.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FSOC CHINA RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION REPORT
The constitution and laws provide for freedom of religious belief and the
freedom not to believe, although the constitution only protects religious
activities defined as "normal." The government sought to restrict legal
religious practice to government-sanctioned organizations and registered
places of worship and to control the growth and scope of the activity of
both registered and unregistered religious groups, including house churches.
Religious groups must register with a government-affiliated patriotic
religious association (PRA) associated with one of the five recognized
religions: Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Protestantism, and Catholicism. The PRAs
supervised the activities of each of these religious groups and liaised with
government religious affairs authorities charged with monitoring religious
activity. The government tried to control and regulate religious groups,
particularly unregistered groups. Nonetheless, membership in many religious
groups continued to grow rapidly. The extent of religious freedom continued
to vary widely within the country.
Freedom to participate in officially sanctioned religious activity
continued to increase in most areas. Religious activity grew not only among
the five main religions, but also among the Eastern Orthodox Church and folk
religions. Some unregistered groups continued to experience varying degrees
of official interference and harassment. Severe crackdowns against
unregistered Protestants and Catholics, Muslims, and Tibetan Buddhists
continued, and the government increased its control over some peaceful
religious practices. The level of repression of religious freedom in Tibetan
areas increased, and there was some tightening of official control over
religious freedom in the XUAR. The government also continued its severe
repression of groups that it determined to be "cults," targeting the Falun
Gong spiritual movement in particular. All religious venues were required to
register with the State Administration for Religious Affairs (SARA) or its
provincial or local offices, which are known as Religious Affairs Bureaus
(RABs). SARA and the RABs were responsible for monitoring and judging
whether religious activity was "normal" and therefore lawful. SARA and the
CCP's United Front Work Department provided policy guidance and supervision
over implementation of government regulations on religious activity.
The 2005 regulations on religious affairs (RRA) delineated regulatory
activities governing religious affairs and consolidated official
pronouncements within a legal framework.
The regulations protect the rights of registered religious groups, under
certain conditions, to possess property, publish literature, train and
approve clergy, and collect donations. However, the regulations have done
little to expand religious freedom, as the activities of unregistered
religious groups remain outside the scope of the RRA's legal protection. The
regulations provide general protection only for freedom of "religious
belief," but not expressions of belief, and merely codify past practices,
including restrictions over officially recognized religious communities. The
regulations protect only those religious beliefs categorized vaguely as
"normal." In practice party doctrine guides the resolution of religious
issues and the implementation of regulations. The regulations also give
authorities broad discretion to define which religious activities are
permissible. The law requires religious groups to register places of
worship.
Spiritual activities in places of worship that have not registered may be
considered illegal and participants can be punished. Government officials
stated that private homes where family and friends meet to study the Bible
would not be required to register, but venues for formal worship services
should be registered, even if such formal worship takes place in a private
home. Clergy need not be approved by the government but must be reported to
the government after being selected pursuant to the rules of the relevant
government-affiliated religious association. Pressure on religious groups to
register or to come under the supervision of official religious
organizations continued during the year. Some groups registered voluntarily,
while some registered under pressure. Several groups avoided officials in an
attempt to avoid registration, and the government refused to register some
groups. Various unofficial groups reported that authorities refused them
registration without explanation. The government contended that these
refusals were mainly the result of failure to meet requirements concerning
facilities and meeting spaces. Some religious groups were reluctant to
comply with the regulations out of principled opposition to state control of
religion or due to fear of adverse consequences if they revealed, as
required, the names and addresses of church leaders and members. Local
authorities' handling of Protestant "house churches" varied in different
regions of the country.
In some regions unregistered house churches with hundreds of members met
openly, with the full knowledge of local authorities, who characterized the
meetings as informal gatherings. In other areas house church meetings of
more than a handful of family members and friends were strictly proscribed.
Leaders of unauthorized groups were sometimes the target of abuse.
Authorities often disrupted house church meetings and retreats; detained,
beat, and harassed leaders and church members; and confiscated the personal
property of house church leaders and members. House churches were more
likely to encounter difficulties when their membership grew, when they
arranged for the regular use of facilities for the purpose of conducting
religious activities, or when they forged links with other unregistered
groups. In February police and local RAB officials reportedly raided a
prayer meeting at a private home in Jiangsu Province.
When some of the individuals at the meeting refused to give their names,
police reportedly beat them. Police also forced the owner of the home to
sign a statement agreeing not to hold religious activities in his home. In
March and December, authorities in Beijing and in several provinces
reportedly detained and interrogated members of the China House Church
Alliance about their connections to foreigners and about alleged plans to
disrupt the 2008 Olympic Games. In May police in Aksu, XUAR, reportedly
arrested about 30 house church leaders who had met with overseas Christians.
Six of the house church leaders were accused of involvement in "evil cult
activities," and two were abused during interrogation. During a closed trial
in June, a Beijing court sentenced house church activist Hua Huaiqi to six
months in prison for obstruction of justice. Police reportedly beat him in
jail and poured cold water over him in frigid weather. In July and August,
at least 17 house church leaders in eight provinces were reportedly detained
as part of a "strike hard" campaign against unauthorized religious activity.
Christian attorney Li Heping reported that, on September 29, a group of men
ordered him to stop practicing law, beat him, and struck him with electric
batons for nearly five hours. Li, who went into hiding after the attack, was
a prominent advocate in religious freedom and human rights cases. On
November 18, public security bureau officers in Henan detained 40 church
leaders from the China Gospel Fellowship. In June 2006 Henan Province house
church pastor Zhang Rongliang was convicted of obtaining a passport through
fraud and of illegal border crossing and sentenced to prison. Harassment of
unregistered Catholic bishops, priests, and laypersons continued, including
government surveillance and detentions.
In March police detained Bishop Wu Qinjing, the bishop of Zhouzhi, Shaanxi
Province. His whereabouts remained unknown. On March 9, a government
document stated that Bishop Wu should not run any church affairs as a bishop
or interfere with the Zhouzhi diocese management. In June police detained
73-year-old Jia Zhiguo, an underground bishop of the diocese of Zhengding,
Hebei Province, and held him for 17 days in an unknown location. In July
officials in Inner Mongolia detained three priests, Liang Aijun, Wang Zhong,
and a third individual whose name has not been reported, who had fled from
Hebei Province. On July 30, 82-year-old Bishop Yao Liang was arrested, and
he remained in detention at year's end. In August Bishop Jia Zhiguo
reportedly was again detained and held without charge until December 14. In
September underground Bishop Han Dingxiang, who reportedly suffered from
cancer and had been under house arrest or other forms of detention for
nearly eight years, died at a hospital while under police custody. There was
no new information about unregistered Bishop Su Zhimin, who has been
unaccounted for since his reported detention in 1997. The government had not
responded to reports that Bishop Su died in June 2006. The government and
the Holy See have not established diplomatic relations, and there was no
Vatican representative on the mainland.
The state-controlled Catholic Patriotic Association (CPA) does not recognize
the authority of the Holy See to appoint bishops. However, while bishops
continued to be appointed according to CPA rules, the CPA returned to its
historical practice of allowing the Vatican's discreet and very limited
involvement in selecting some bishops. The role of the pope in selecting
bishops, the status of underground Catholic clerics, and Vatican recognition
of Taiwan remained obstacles to improved relations, although there were some
new efforts toward rapprochement between the government and the Vatican. In
January the Vatican issued an invitation to the government to enter a
dialogue on restoring diplomatic relations and announced that it would set
up a permanent commission to handle relations with the government. In June
Pope Benedict XVI issued an open letter to Chinese Catholics inviting them
to resolve differences and called for a "respectful and constructive
dialogue" leading to normalized relations. The pope's letter was available
online, although local authorities reportedly blocked some Web sites
carrying the letter. A Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson stated the
government advocated improvement in relations. In September Xiao Zejiang,
who was a member of the Guizhou Provincial People's Political Consultative
Congress, was ordained as coadjutor bishop of the Guizhou Diocese.
Bishop Xiao's ordination was the first of five ordinations approved both by
Beijing and the Vatican following the pope's June letter to Chinese
Catholics. Previously, in 2006 Wang Renlei, Ma Yingling, and Liu Xinhong
were appointed as bishops without the approval of the Holy See.In some
official Catholic churches, clerics lead prayers for the pope and pictures
of the pope were displayed. An estimated 90 percent of official Catholic
bishops have reconciled with the Vatican.Traditional folk religions, such as
Fujian Province's "Mazu cult," were still practiced in some locations.
They were tolerated to varying degrees, often seen as loose affiliates of
Taoism or as ethnic minority cultural practices. However, the government
labeled folk religions "feudal superstition" and sometimes repressed them.
SARA established a new administrative division responsible for the
activities of folk religions and religions outside the main five, including
the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints. Buddhists made up the largest body of organized religious believers.
The traditional practice of Buddhism continued to expand among citizens in
many parts of the country. However, the government created an increasingly
repressive environment for the practice of Tibetan Buddhists. The intensity
of religious repression against Tibetan Buddhists varied across regions. Two
new sets of legal measures increased the legal basis for repression. On
January 1, the TAR implemented the PRC Religious Affairs Management
Regulations, which are more restrictive than the TAR's previous 1991
regulations. The new regulations assert state control over nearly all
aspects of Tibetan Buddhism, from the management of monasteries to the
movement of monks and nuns. On September 1, another set of new regulations
went into effect, empowering the party and the government to approve all
reincarnate lamas, the top leaders of Tibetan Buddhism.
With the implementation of this new measure, the government attempted to
control a vital feature of Tibetan Buddhism, the lineages of the
reincarnated Buddhist teachers that span centuries (see Tibet Addendum). In
Tibetan areas of Sichuan and Qinghai, a "religious education campaign"
coerced Tibetans into denouncing the Dalai Lama and forced parents to
withdraw their children from monasteries where they were receiving a Tibetan
education and put them in regular Chinese elementary schools. Other
government restrictions used to justify repression remained, particularly
where the government interpreted Buddhist belief as supporting separatism,
such as in some Tibetan areas and parts of the Inner Mongolian Autonomous
Region. Authorities continued to try to prevent Tibetans from leaving the
country to obtain a religious education, under the guise of promoting
stability by thwarting separatists. From June 29 to July 5, envoys of the
Dalai Lama met with government officials, in the sixth round of dialogue
between the two sides since 2002 (see Tibet Addendum).
The government tightly controlled the practice of Islam, and official
repression in the XUAR targeted at Uighur Muslims tightened in some areas.
Regulations restricting Muslims' religious activity, teaching, and places of
worship continued to be implemented forcefully in the XUAR. The government
continued to repress Uighur Muslims, sometimes citing counterterrorism as
the basis for taking action that was repressive. XUAR authorities detained
and arrested persons engaged in unauthorized religious activities. The
government reportedly continued to limit access to mosques, detain citizens
for possession of unauthorized religious texts, imprison citizens for
religious activities determined to be "extremist," force Muslims who were
fasting to eat during Ramadan, and confiscate Muslims' passports in an
effort to strengthen control over Muslim pilgrimages.
In addition the XUAR government maintained the most severe legal
restrictions in China on children's right to practice religion. In recent
years XUAR authorities detained and arrested persons engaged in unauthorized
religious activities and charged them with a range of offenses, including
state security crimes. Xinjiang authorities often charged religious
believers with committing the "three evils" of terrorism, separatism, and
extremism. XUAR authorities prohibited women, children, CCP members, and
government workers from entering mosques. Local officials reportedly
arrested or expelled as many as 84 foreign citizens on charges of "illegal
religious activity."Local authorities in the XUAR reportedly also committed
one associate of expelled foreign citizens to two years of reeducation
through labor for assisting the foreigners with conducting "illegal
religious activities." Authorities reportedly detained another associate for
violating an order that limits proselytizing in XUAR. The state-controlled
Islamic Association of China (IAC) aligned Islamic practice to CCP goals.
However, in contrast to the heavy-handed approach to Muslims in the XUAR,
officials in Ningxia, Gansu, Qinghai, and Yunnan provinces approached
religious affairs cautiously and were reluctant to interfere overtly in
Muslims' activities. Authorities reserved the right to censor imams'
sermons, and imams were urged to emphasize the damage caused to Islam by
terrorist acts in the name of the religion. Certain Muslim leaders received
particularly harsh treatment. Authorities conducted monthly political study
sessions for religious personnel, and the program continued through the
year. Authorities also reportedly tried to restrict Muslims' opportunities
to study religion overseas. The China Islamic Conference required religious
personnel to study "new collected sermons" compiled by an IAC committee,
including messages on patriotism and unity aimed at building a "socialist
harmonious society."
In addition to the restrictions on practicing religion placed on party
members and government officials throughout the country, teachers,
professors, and university students in the XUAR were sometimes not allowed
to practice religion openly. A local party secretary, Zhang Zhengrong,
reportedly called on schools to strengthen propaganda education during
Ramadan and to put a stop to activities including fasting and professing a
religion. The Kashgar Teachers College reportedly implemented a series of
measures to prevent students from observing Ramadan, including imposing
communal meals and requiring students to obtain permission to leave campus.
School authorities also made students gather for a school assembly at a time
of day coinciding with Friday prayers.
In 2006 the IAC established an office to manage the hajj pilgrimages, and
the government took steps to prevent Muslims from traveling on unauthorized
pilgrimages. The government continued to enforce a policy barring Muslims
from obtaining hajj visas outside of China. The government reportedly
published banners and slogans discouraging hajj pilgrimages outside those
organized by the IAC. Foreign media reported that XUAR officials confiscated
the passports of an unknown number of Uighur Muslims in an effort to prevent
unauthorized hajj pilgrimages. Foreign media reported that some Uighur
Muslims were told they would have to pay a deposit of $7,000 (RMB 50,000) to
retrieve their passports for overseas travel. Government officials in some
areas also arbitrarily detained Muslims to prevent them from going on the
hajj, required them to show that their hajj travel funds were not borrowed
from other sources, and required them to pass a health test.
Official reports noted that 10,804 Chinese Muslims traveled to Mecca for the
2006-7 hajj pilgrimage. This figure did not include participants who were
not organized by the government, for whom there were no official estimates
but who numbered in the thousands in previous years.
The law does not prohibit religious believers from holding public office;
however, party membership is required for almost all high-level positions in
government, state-owned businesses, and many official organizations. CCP
officials stated that party membership and religious belief were
incompatible and that religious believers should resign their party
membership.
However, in a December 18 Politburo collective study on religion,
President Hu Jintao emphasized the positive role of religion in building a
harmonious society and noted that the 17th Communist Party Congress stressed
the need to bring into play the role of religion "in promoting economic and
social development." The PLA Routine Service Regulations state explicitly
that service members "may not take part in religious or superstitious
activities." CCP and PLA personnel have been expelled for adhering to Falun
Gong beliefs.Despite regulations encouraging officials to be atheists, some
party officials engaged in religious activity, most commonly Buddhism or a
folk religion. The NPC included several religious representatives. Religious
groups also were represented in the CPPCC, an advisory forum for
"multiparty" cooperation and consultation led by the CCP, and in local and
provincial governments. CPPCC Standing Committee vice chairmen included
Pagbalha Geleg Namgyal, a Tibetan reincarnate lama, and Cao Shengjie,
president of the China Christian Council.
The authorities permitted officially sanctioned religious organizations to
maintain international contacts that do not involve "foreign control."
However, what constitutes "control" is not defined. Regulations on religious
practice by foreigners include a ban on proselytizing. Authorities generally
allowed foreign nationals to preach to other foreigners, bring in religious
materials for personal use, and preach to citizens at the invitation of
registered religious organizations. Despite a ban on missionary activities,
many foreign Christians teaching on college campuses openly professed their
faith with minimum interference from authorities provided their religious
activity remained discreet. Authorities permitted citizens who joined the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints while outside of China to hold
services after their return.The authorities continued a general crackdown on
groups considered to be "cults." These "cults" included not only Falun Gong
and various traditional Chinese meditation and exercise groups (known
collectively as qigong groups), but also religious groups that authorities
accused of preaching beliefs outside the bounds of officially approved
doctrine.
Actions against members of such groups continued during the year. In spring
police in Liaoning Province sentenced Gu Changrong and Gu Zhaohong, members
of the Society of Disciples, to one-year terms of reeducation-through-labor
for allegedly preaching to a local CCP member. Police confiscated several
Bibles from the home of Gu Zhaohong. Police also continued efforts to close
down the underground evangelical group Shouters, an offshoot of a pre-1949
indigenous Protestant group. Government action against the South China
Church (SCC) continued. SCC founder Gong Shengliang and other imprisoned SCC
members reportedly continued to suffer serious abuses and poor health in
prison. Gong was serving a life sentence for rape, arson, and assault, even
though the women who testified against him in his original trial in 2001
reported that police had tortured them into signing statements accusing Gong
of raping them.
Public Falun Gong activity in the country remained negligible, and
practitioners based abroad reported that the government's crackdown against
the group continued. In the past, the mere belief in the discipline (even
without any public practice of its tenets) sometimes was sufficient grounds
for practitioners to receive punishments ranging from loss of employment to
imprisonment. Falun Gong sources estimated that since 1999 at least 6,000
Falun Gong practitioners have been sentenced to prison, more than 100,000
practitioners sentenced to reeducation-through-labor, and almost 3,000 died
from torture while in custody. Some foreign observers estimated that Falun
Gong adherents constituted at least half of the 250,000 officially recorded
inmates in reeducation-through-labor camps, while Falun Gong sources
overseas placed the number even higher. In the past, many practitioners were
detained multiple times.
Over the past several years, Falun Gong members identified by the government
as "core leaders" were singled out for particularly harsh treatment. More
than a dozen Falun Gong members were sentenced to prison for the crime of
"endangering state security," but the great majority of Falun Gong members
convicted by the courts since 1999 were sentenced to prison for "organizing
or using a sect to undermine the implementation of the law," a less serious
offense. Most practitioners, however, were punished administratively. Some
practitioners were sentenced to reeducation-through-labor. Among them, Yuan
Yuju and Liang Jinhui, relatives of a Hong Kong journalist working for a
television station supportive of Falun Gong, were sentenced to
reeducation-through-labor for distributing Falun Gong materials. Some Falun
Gong members were sent to "legal education" centers specifically established
to "rehabilitate" practitioners who refused to recant their belief
voluntarily after their release from reeducation-through-labor camps.
Government officials denied the existence of such "legal education" centers.
In addition hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners were confined to mental
hospitals, according to overseas groups.
Police continued to detain current and former Falun Gong practitioners and
used possession of Falun Gong material as a pretext for arresting political
activists. In March Chi Jianwei, a member of the CDP, was sentenced to three
years in prison for using a cult to undermine implementation of the law,
reportedly after authorities found Falun Gong material at his house. Early
in the year, authorities sentenced Cui Xin, an elderly resident of Harbin,
to seven years' imprisonment for her involvement with Falun Gong. Police
confiscated Falun Gong materials from Cui's home following her arrest in
December 2006. The government continued its use of high-pressure tactics and
mandatory anti-Falun Gong study sessions to force practitioners to renounce
Falun Gong. Even practitioners who had not protested or made other public
demonstrations of belief reportedly were forced to attend anti-Falun Gong
classes or were sent directly to reeducation-through-labor camps. These
tactics reportedly resulted in large numbers of practitioners signing
pledges to renounce the movement.
The government supported atheism in schools. In March 2005 a Foreign
Ministry spokesperson said the country had no national regulations
preventing children from receiving religious instruction but said religion
should not interfere with public education. In practice local authorities in
many regions barred school-age children from attending religious services at
mosques, temples, or churches and prevented them from receiving religious
education outside the home. Official religious organizations administered
local religious schools, seminaries, and institutes to train priests,
ministers, imams, Islamic scholars, and Buddhist monks.
Students who attended these institutes had to demonstrate "political
reliability," and all graduates must pass an examination on their political,
as well as theological, knowledge to qualify for the clergy. The government
permitted registered religions to train clergy and allowed an increasing
number of Catholic and Protestant seminarians, Muslim clerics, and Buddhist
clergy to go abroad for additional religious studies, but some religion
students had difficulty getting passports or obtaining approval to study
abroad. In most cases foreign organizations provided funding for such
training programs.Authorities continued to prohibit the teaching of Islam to
elementary and middle school-age children in some areas, although children
studied Arabic and the Koran without restriction in many others. Local
officials stated that school-age children may not study religion or enter
mosques in the XUAR.
Although Bibles and other religious texts were available in most parts of
the country, the government tightly regulated the publication of religious
texts and prohibited individuals from printing religious material. The 2005
religious regulations permits authorized religious organizations and venues
to compile and print materials for internal and public distribution but
requires publications to be prepared in accordance with national
regulations. These regulations, in turn, impose strict prior restraints on
religious literature, even beyond the restrictions on other types of
publications. The regulations also provide for government oversight of the
appointment of religious personnel. On August 31, house church leader Zhou
Heng was detained in the XUAR for "illegal business operation." Zhou
reportedly had imported three tons of Bibles from South Korea, and he
remained in prison at year's end.
In April 2006 Pastor Liu Yuhua from Shandong was detained in Linchu County on charges of operating an illegal business after he was found distributing religious texts. In July 2005 Protestant Pastor Cai Zhuohua and two other relatives were sentenced to prison for operating an illegal business, stemming from their large-scale publishing of Bibles and Christian literature without government approval. According to media reports during the year, XUAR authorities also confiscated 25,000 illegal religious publications.
In February 2006 XUAR authorities reportedly raided a minority-language
printing market and seized "illegally printed" religious posters. Also in
February authorities announced that in 2005 they had seized 9,860 illegal
publications involving religion, Falun Gong, or "feudal superstitions." The
Xinjiang People's Publication House was the only publisher officially
permitted to print Muslim literature. The supply of Bibles was adequate in
most parts of the country, but some members of underground churches
complained that the supply and distribution of Bibles, especially in rural
locations, was inadequate. Individuals could not order Bibles directly from
publishing houses. Customs officials continued to monitor for the
"smuggling" of religious materials into the country. Authorities in a few
areas reportedly sometimes confiscated Bibles, Korans, and other religious
material.
Societal Abuses and Discrimination
There were no reports of societal abuses of religious practitioners or
anti-Semitic acts during the year. The government does not recognize Judaism
as an ethnicity or religion.For a more detailed discussion, see the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA STATE DEPT. 2007 International Religious Freedom Report.
d. Freedom of Movement, Internally Displaced Persons, Protection of
Refugees, and Stateless Persons
The law provides for some of these rights; however, the government generally
did not respect them in practice. Although the government maintained
restrictions on the freedom to change one's workplace or residence, the
national household registration system continued to erode, and the ability
of most citizens to move within the country to work and live continued to
expand. Authorities heightened restrictions periodically, particularly
curtailing the movement of individuals deemed politically sensitive before
key anniversaries, visits of foreign dignitaries, and to forestall
demonstrations.
The system of national household registration (hukou) underwent further
change during the year. Rural residents continued to migrate to the cities,
where the per capita disposable income was more than quadruple the rural per
capita income, but many could not officially change their residence or
workplace within the country. Most cities had annual quotas for the number
of new temporary residence permits that would be issued, and all workers,
including university graduates, had to compete for a limited number of such
permits. It was particularly difficult for peasants from rural areas to
obtain household registration in more economically developed urban areas.
The household registration system added to the difficulties rural residents
faced even after they relocated to urban areas and found employment. In
March 2006 the National Bureau of Statistics estimated that there was a
floating population of 147.35 million, nearly one-third of which moved
between provinces. These economic migrants lacked official residence status
in cities, and it was difficult or impossible for them to gain full access
to social services, including education. Furthermore, law and society
generally limited migrant workers to types of work considered least
desirable by local residents, and such workers had little recourse when
subjected to abuse by employers and officials. Some major cities maintained
programs to provide migrant workers and their children access to public
education and other social services free of charge, but migrants in some
locations reported that it was difficult to qualify for these benefits in
practice.
Many cities and provinces continued experiments aimed at further eroding the
distinction between urban and rural residents in household registration
documents. At the beginning of the year, the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone
delinked the right to participate in the public pension system from workers'
hukou status, allowing all workers who have lived in the zone for 15 years
and contributed to the pension system to claim benefits. Under the "staying
at prison employment" system applicable to recidivists incarcerated in
reeducation-through-labor camps, authorities denied certain persons
permission to return to their homes after serving their sentences. Some
released or paroled prisoners returned home but were not permitted freedom
of movement.
The government permitted legal emigration and foreign travel for most
citizens. Most citizens could obtain passports, although those whom the
government deemed threats, including religious leaders, political
dissidents, and some ethnic minority members continued to have difficulty
obtaining passports (see Tibet Addendum). There were reports that some
academics faced travel restrictions around the year's sensitive
anniversaries, particularly the June 4 anniversary of the Tiananmen Square
massacre. There were instances in which the authorities refused to issue
passports or visas on apparent political grounds. Members of underground
churches, Falun Gong members, and other politically sensitive individuals
sometimes were refused passports or otherwise prevented from traveling
overseas.
In February local authorities blocked prominent HIV/AIDS activist Dr.
Gao Yaojie from traveling overseas to receive a human rights award.
Following international pressure, authorities relented. On August 24,
authorities in Beijing reportedly confiscated the passport of Yuan Weijing
to prevent her from traveling overseas to receive a human rights award for
her imprisoned husband, legal activist Chen Guangcheng. Also in August
authorities denied rights lawyer Zheng Enchong's application for a passport
to travel to Hong Kong and Macau. They had previously told Zheng to stop
opposing the government and working with human rights groups in Hong Kong.
The law neither provides for a citizen's right to repatriate nor otherwise
addresses exile. The government continued to refuse reentry to numerous
citizens who were considered dissidents, Falun Gong activists, or
troublemakers. Although some dissidents living abroad were allowed to
return, dissidents released on medical parole and allowed to leave the
country often were effectively exiled. Activists residing abroad were
imprisoned upon their return to the country.
Some 2,445 Tibetans reportedly fled Tibetan areas for India in 2006, most of
them teenagers and novice monks and nuns seeking religious education. Police
vowed to "strike hard" against such border crossings as part of a campaign
against "separatists." While the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
reported that more than 2,000 Tibetans each year crossed into Nepal, the
government continued to try to prevent many Tibetans from leaving and
detained many who were apprehended in flight (see Tibet Addendum).
Protection of Refugees
Although the country is a signatory of the 1951 UN Convention relating to
the Status of Refugees and its 1967 protocol, the law does not provide for
the granting of refugee or asylum status. The government largely cooperated
with the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) when
dealing with the resettlement of ethnic Han Chinese or ethnic minorities
from Vietnam and Laos resident in the country. During the year the
government and UNHCR continued ongoing discussions concerning the granting
of citizenship to these residents. However, the government continued to deny
the UNHCR permission to operate along its northeastern border with North
Korea, arguing that North Koreans who crossed the border were illegal
economic migrants, not refugees. The government did not provide protection
against refoulement, the return of refugees to a country where there is
reason to believe they face persecution.
During the year authorities continued to detain and forcibly return North Koreans to North Korea, where many faced persecution and some may have been executed upon their return. Some North Koreans were permitted to travel to third countries after they had entered diplomatic compounds or international schools in the country. There were numerous reports of harassment and detention of North Koreans in the country. The children of some North Korean asylum seekers and of mixed couples (i.e., one Chinese parent and one North Korean parent) reportedly did not have access to health care or education. The government also arrested and detained journalists, missionaries, and activists, including some citizens, who provided food, shelter, transportation, and other assistance to North Koreans. In February police reportedly arrested a foreign national who arranged for five North Korean asylum seekers to travel to South Korea. According to reports, activists or brokers helping North Koreans were charged with human smuggling, and the North Koreans were forcibly returned to North Korea. There were also reports that North Korean agents operated within the country to forcibly repatriate North Korean citizens.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the
development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have
in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in
the dignity and worth of the human person, and in the equal rights of
men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better
standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights
and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of
this pledge,
Now, therefore, The General Assembly, proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
Article 1
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of a kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional, or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing, or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 3
Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and the security of person.
Article 4
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 5
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6
Everyone has the right to recognition
everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 9
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile.
Article 10
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11
1. Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.
2. No one shall be held guilty without any limitation due to race, of any penal offence on account of nationality or religion, have the any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed.
Article 12
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary
interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor to
attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the
protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 13
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Article 14
1. Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy
in other countries asylum from persecution.
2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 15
1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor be denied the right to change his nationality.
Article 16
1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality, or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
3. The family is the natural and fundamental
group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the
State.
Article 17
1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
Article 18
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance.
Article 19Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 20
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
Article 21
1. Everyone has the right to take part in the Government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
2. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
3. The will of the people shall be the basis of
the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic
and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and
shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
Article 22
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international cooperation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social, and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Article 23
1. Everyone has the right to work, to free
choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to
protection against unemployment.
2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for
equal work.
3. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration insuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
4. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
Article 24
Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Article 25
1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age, or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to
special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of
wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
Article 26
1. Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
2. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.
Article 27
1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts, and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary, or artistic production of which he is the author.
Article 28
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29
1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be
exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 30
FSOC DAILY ASIA NEWS AND WEATHER
http://asiahilltribechurch.8k.com
FSOC DAILY PRAYER
DEAR LORD.....
LORD HAVE MERCY
Lord, make me an instrument of Thy peace;
That where there is hatred - I may bring love,
That where there is wrong - I may bring the spirit of forgiveness,
That where there is discord - I may bring harmony,
That where there is error - I may bring truth,
That where there is doubt - I may bring faith,
That where there are shadows - I may bring Thy light,
That where there is sadness - I may bring joy.
Lord, grant that I may seek to console - than to be consoled,
To understand - than to be loved.
Because
It is by giving that one receives,
It is by self-forgetting that one finds,
It is by forgiving that one is forgiven,
It is by owing that one awakes to the eternal life.
SAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI-1182-1226-ASSISI-ITALY
"IF"
If you can keep your head when all about
you
demorats are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all demorats doubt you
But make allowance for their dumb doubting too,
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in demorat lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to demorat hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream- and not make dreams your master,
If you can think- and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by demorat knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breath a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings- nor lose the common touch,
If neither demorat foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
If all men count with you, but none too much,
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And- which is more- you'll be a REPUBLICAN
- Rudyard Kipling-
modification by
COL.WALTER E. KURTZ
FSOC COMMANDER
FROM MEDITATIONS AND PRAYERS LED BY THE
HOLY FATHER POPE BENEDICT XVI ON GOOD FRIDAY 2006
COMPOSED BY Archbishop ANGELO COMASTRI Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican
City President of the Fabric of Saint Peter's
• We have lost our sense of sin!
Today a slick campaign of propaganda
Is spreading an inane apologia of evil,
A senseless cult of Satan,
A mindless desire for transgression,
A dishonest and frivolous freedom,
Exalting impulsiveness, immorality and selfishness
As if they were new heights of sophistication.a
Lord Jesus,
Open our eyes:
Let us see the filth around us
And recognize it for what it is,
So that a single tear of sorrow
Can restore us to purity of heart
And the breadth of true freedom.
Open our eyes, Lord, Jesus!
• Surely God is deeply pained
By the attack on the family.
Today we seem to be witnessing
A kind of anti-Genesis,
A counter-plan, a diabolical pride
Aimed at eliminating the family.
There is a move to reinvent mankind,
To modify the very grammar of life
As planned and willed by God.
But, to take God’s place, without being God,
Is insane arrogance,
A risky and dangerous venture.
May Christ’s fall open our eyes
To see once more the beautiful face,
The true face, the holy face of the family.
The face of the family
which all of us need.
• Lord Jesus,
Purity has everywhere fallen victim
To a calculated conspiracy of silence: an impure silence!
People have even come to believe
A complete lie:
That purity is somehow the enemy of love.
But the opposite is true, O Lord!
Purity is necessary
As a condition for love:
A love that is true, a love that is faithful.
In any event, Lord,
If we cannot be the master of ourselves?
How can we give ourselves to others?
• Everything seems over,
The wicked seem to triumph,
And evil appears more powerful than good.
But faith enables us to see afar,
it makes us glimpse the break of a new day
On the other side of this day.
Faith promises us that the final word
belongs to God: to God alone!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pope says rich nations "plundered" Third World
Wed Apr 4, 2007
VATICAN CITY - Rich countries bent on power and profit have mercilessly "plundered and sacked" Africa and other poor regions and exported to them the "cynicism of a world without God," Pope Benedict writes in his first book.The Pope also condemns drug trafficking and sexual tourism, saying they are signs of a world brimming with "people who are empty" yet living among abundant material goods.One section of the book was printed in Wednesday's Corriere Della Sera daily before publication later this month by Italian publisher Rizzoli, which owns the newspaper. A Rizzoli spokeswoman confirmed the authenticity of the excerpts.In the 400-page book, called "Jesus of Nazareth," the Pope offers a modern application of Jesus's parable of the Good Samaritan, who stopped to help a man who had been robbed by thieves when others, including a priest, had not."The current relevance of the parable is obvious," the Pope writes."If we apply it to the dimensions of globalised society today, we see how the populations of Africa have been plundered and sacked and this concerns us intimately," the Pope says in his book, which comes out on April 16, his 80th birthday.He drew a link between the lifestyle of people in the developed world and the dire conditions of people in Africa.
STRIPPED NAKED
"We see how our lifestyle, the history that involved us, has stripped them naked and continues to strip them naked," he writes.The German Pope, who has condemned the effects of colonialism before, said rich countries had also hurt poor countries spiritually by belittling or trying to wipe out their own cultural and spiritual traditions."Instead of giving them God, the God close to us in Christ, and welcoming in their traditions all that is precious and great ... we have brought them the cynicism of a world without God, where only power and profit count...," he writes.The Pope says his comments were valid for other regions apart from Africa.In what could be seen as a strong self-criticism of the Roman Catholic Church, whose missionary activities often went hand-in-glove with colonialism, the Pope writes:"We destroyed (their) moral criteria to the point that corruption and a lust for power devoid of scruples have become obvious."
ABOARD THE PAPAL PLANE
- Pope Benedict warned Catholic politicians they risked excommunication from the Church and should not receive communion if they support abortion.It was the first time that the Pope, speaking to reporters aboard the plane taking him on a trip to Brazil, dealt in depth with a controversial topic that has come up in many countries, including the United States, Mexico, and Italy.The Pope was asked whether he supported Mexican Church leaders threatening to excommunicate leftist parliamentarians who last month voted to legalize abortion in Mexico City."Yes, this excommunication was not an arbitrary one but is allowed by Canon (church) law which says that the killing of an innocent child is incompatible with receiving communion, which is receiving the body of Christ," he said."They (Mexican Church leaders) did nothing new, surprising or arbitrary. They simply announced publicly what is contained in the law of the Church... which expresses our appreciation for life and that human individuality, human personality is present from the first moment (of life)".Under Church law, someone who knowingly does or backs something which the Church considers a grave sin, such as abortion, inflicts what is known as "automatic excommunication" on themselves.The Pope said parliamentarians who vote in favor of abortion have "doubts about the value of life and the beauty of life and even a doubt about the future"."Selfishness and fear are at the root of (pro-abortion) legislation," he said. "We in the Church have a great struggle to defend life...life is a gift not a threat."
"ALWAYS A GIFT"
The Pope's comments appear to raise the stakes in the debate over whether Catholic politicians can support abortion or gay marriage and still consider themselves proper Catholics.In recent months, the Vatican has been accused of interference in Italy for telling Catholic lawmakers to oppose a draft law that would grant some rights to unwed and gay couples.During the 2004 presidential election, the U.S. Catholic community was split over whether to support Democratic candidate John Kerry, himself a Catholic who backed abortion rights.Some Catholics say they personally would not have an abortion but feel obliged to support a woman's right to choose.But the Church, which teaches that life begins at the moment of conception and that abortion is murder, says Catholics cannot have it both ways."The Church says life is beautiful, it is not something to doubt but it is a gift even when it is lived in difficult circumstances. It is always a gift," the Pope said.Only Cuba, Guyana and U.S. commonwealth Puerto Rico allow abortion on demand in Latin America. Many other countries in the region permit it in special cases, such as if the fetus has defects or if the mother's life is at risk.Brazil, the world's most populous Catholic country, is mulling bringing the debate to a referendum.
Letter of His Holiness Pope Benedict
XVI to Chinese Catholics
IN RED COMMUNIST CHINA
27 May 2007
By his “Letter to Bishops, Priests, Consecrated Persons and Lay Faithful of the Catholic Church in the People’s Republic of China”, which bears the date of Pentecost Sunday, Pope Benedict XVI wishes to express his love for and his closeness to the Catholics who live in China. He does so, obviously, as Successor of Peter and Universal Pastor of the Church.From the text two basic thoughts are clear: on the one hand, the Pope’s deep affection for the entire Catholic community in China and, on the other, his passionate fidelity to the great values of the Catholic tradition in the ecclesiological field; hence, a passion for charity and a passion for the truth. The Pope recalls the great ecclesiological principles of the Second Vatican Council and the Catholic tradition, but at the same time takes into consideration particular aspects of the life of the Church in China, setting them in an ample theological perspective.
A. The Church in China in the last fifty years
The Catholic community in China has lived the past fifty years in an intense way, undertaking a difficult and painful journey, which not only has deeply marked it but has also caused it to take on particular characteristics which continue to mark it today.The Catholic community suffered an initial persecution in the 1950s, which witnessed the expulsion of foreign Bishops and missionaries, the imprisonment of almost all Chinese clerics and the leaders of the various lay movements, the closing of churches and the isolation of the faithful. Then, at the end of the 1950s, various state bodies were established, such as the Office for Religious Affairs and the Patriotic Association of Chinese Catholics, with the aim of directing and “controlling” all religious activity. In 1958 the first two episcopal ordinations without papal mandate took place, initiating a long series of actions which deeply damaged ecclesial communion.In the decade 1966-1976, the Cultural Revolution, which took place throughout the country, violently affected the Catholic community, striking even those Bishops, priests and lay faithful who had shown themselves more amenable to the new orientations imposed by government authorities.In the 1980s, with the gestures of openness promoted by Deng Xiaoping, there began a period of religious tolerance with some possibility of movement and dialogue, which led to the reopening of churches, seminaries and religious houses, and to a certain revival of community life. The information coming from communities of the Catholic Church in China confirmed that the blood of the martyrs had once again been the seed of new Christians: the faith had remained alive in the communities; the majority of Catholics had given fervent witness of fidelity to Christ and the Church; families had become the key to the transmission of the faith to their members. The new climate, however, provoked different reactions within the Catholic community.In this regard, the Pope notes that some Pastors, “not wishing to be subjected to undue control exercised over the life of the Church, and eager to maintain total fidelity to the Successor of Peter and to Catholic doctrine, have felt themselves constrained to opt for clandestine consecration” to ensure a pastoral service to their own communities (No. 8). In fact, as the Holy Father makes clear, “the clandestine condition is not a normal feature of the Church’s life, and history shows that Pastors and faithful have recourse to it only amid suffering, in the desire to maintain the integrity of their faith and to resist interference from State agencies in matters pertaining intimately to the Church’s life” (ibid.).Others, who were especially concerned with the good of the faithful and with an eye to the future “have consented to receive episcopal ordination without the pontifical mandate, but have subsequently asked to be received into communion with the Successor of Peter and with their other brothers in the episcopate” (ibid.). The Pope, in consideration of the complexity of the situation and being deeply desirous of promoting the re-establishment of full communion, granted many of them “full and legitimate exercise of episcopal jurisdiction”.
Attentively analyzing the situation of the Church in China, Benedict XVI is aware of the fact that the community is suffering internally from a situation of conflict in which both faithful and Pastors are involved. He emphasizes, however, that this painful situation was not brought about by different doctrinal positions but is the result of the “the significant part played by entities that have been imposed as the principal determinants of the life of the Catholic community” (No. 7). These are entities, whose declared purposes – in particular, the aim of implementing the principles of independence, self-government and self-management of the Church – are not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine. This interference has given rise to seriously troubling situations. What is more, Bishops and priests have been subjected to considerable surveillance and coercion in the exercise of their pastoral office.In the 1990s, from many quarters and with increasing frequency, Bishops and priests turned to the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples and the Secretariat of State in order to obtain from the Holy See precise instructions as to how they should conduct themselves with regard to some problems of ecclesial life in China. Many asked what attitude should be adopted towards the government and towards state agencies in charge of Church life. Other queries concerned strictly sacramental problems, such as the possibility of concelebrating with Bishops who had been ordained without papal mandate or of receiving the sacraments from priests ordained by these Bishops. Finally, the legitimizing of numerous Bishops who had been illicitly consecrated confused some sectors of the Catholic community.In addition, the law on registering places of worship and the state requirement of a certificate of membership in the Patriotic Association gave rise to fresh tensions and further questions.During these years, Pope John Paul II on several occasions addressed messages and appeals to the Church in China, calling all Catholics to unity and reconciliation. The interventions of the Holy Father were well received, creating a desire for unity, but sadly the tensions with the authorities and within the Catholic community did not diminish.For its part, the Holy See has provided directives regarding the various problems, but the passage of time and the rise of new situations of increasing complexity required a reconsideration of the overall question in order to provide the clearest answer possible to the queries and to issue sure guidance for pastoral activity in years to come.
B. The history of the Papal Letter
The various problems which seem to have most seriously affected the life of the Church in China in recent years were amply and carefully analyzed by a special select Commission made up of some experts on China and members of the Roman Curia who follow the situation of that community. When Pope Benedict XVI decided to call a meeting from 19-20 January 2007 durring which various ecclesiastics, including some from China, took part, the aforementioned Commission worked to produce a document aimed at ensuring broad discussion on the various points, gathering practical recommendations made by the participants and proposing some possible theological and pastoral guidelines for the Catholic community in China. His Holiness, who graciously took part in the final session of the meeting, decided, among other things, to address a Letter to the Bishops, priests, consecrated persons and lay faithful.
C. Content of the Letter
“Without claiming to deal with every detail of the complex matters well known to you”, writes Benedict XVI to the Catholics of China, “I wish through this letter to offer some guidelines concerning the life of the Church and the task of evangelization in China, in order to help you discover what the Lord and Master Jesus Christ wants from you” (No. 2). The Pope reiterates some fundamental principles of Catholic ecclesiology in order to clarify the more important problems, aware that the light shed by these principles will provide assistance in dealing with the various questions and the more concrete aspects of the life of the Catholic community.While expressing great joy for the fidelity demonstrated by the faithful in China over the past fifty years, Benedict XVI reaffirms the inestimable value of their sufferings and of the persecution endured for the Gospel, and he directs to all an earnest appeal for unity and reconciliation. Since he is aware of the fact that full reconciliation “cannot be accomplished overnight”, he recalls that this path “of reconciliation is supported by the example and the prayer of so many ‘witnesses of faith’ who have suffered and have forgiven, offering their lives for the future of the Catholic Church in China” (No. 6).In this context, the words of Jesus, “Duc in altum” (Lk 5:4), continue to ring true. This is an expression which invites “us to remember the past with gratitude, to live the present with enthusiasm and to look forward to the future with confidence”. In China, as indeed in the rest of the world, “the Church is called to be a witness of Christ, to look forward with hope, and – in proclaiming the Gospel – to measure up to the new challenges that the Chinese people must face” (No. 3). “In your country too” the Pope states, “the proclamation of Christ crucified and risen will be possible to the extent that, with fidelity to the Gospel, in communion with the Successor of the Apostle Peter and with the universal Church, you are able to put into practice the signs of love and unity” (ibid.).In dealing with some of the more urgent problems which emerge from the queries which have reached the Holy See from Bishops and priests, Benedict XVI offers guidance regarding the recognition of ecclesiastics of the clandestine community by the government authorities (cf. No. 7) and he gives much prominence to the subject of the Chinese Episcopate (cf. No. 8), with particular reference to matters surrounding the appointment of Bishops (cf. No. 9). Of special significance are the pastoral directives which the Holy Father gives to the community, which emphasize in the first place the figure and mission of the Bishop in the diocesan community: “nothing without the Bishop”. In addition, he provides guidance for Eucharistic concelebration and he encourages the creation of diocesan bodies laid down by canonical norms. He does not fail to give directions for the training of priests and family life.As for the relationship of the Catholic community to the State, Benedict XVI in a serene and respectful way recalls Catholic doctrine, formulated anew by the Second Vatican Council. He then expresses the sincere hope that the dialogue between the Holy See and the Chinese government will make progress so as to be able to reach agreement on the appointment of Bishops, obtain the full exercise of the faith by Catholics as a result of respect for genuine religious freedom and arrive at the normalization of relations between the Holy See and the Beijing Government.Finally, the Pope revokes all the earlier and more recent faculties and directives of a pastoral nature which had been granted by the Holy See to the Church in China. The changed circumstances of the overall situation of the Church in China and the greater possibilities of communication now enable Catholics to follow the general canonical norms and, where necessary, to have recourse to the Apostolic See. In any event, the doctrinal principles which inspired the above-mentioned faculties and directives now find fresh application in the directives contained in the present Letter (cf. No. 18).
D. Tone and outlook of the Letter
With spiritual concern and using an eminently pastoral language, Benedict XVI addresses the entire Church in China. His intention is not to create situations of harsh confrontation with particular persons or groups: even though he expresses judgments on certain critical situations, he does so with great understanding for the contingent aspects and the persons involved, while upholding the theological principles with great clarity. The Pope wishes to invite the Church to a deeper fidelity to Jesus Christ and he reminds all Chinese Catholics of their mission to be evangelizers in the present specific context of their country. The Holy Father views with respect and deep sympathy the ancient and recent history of the great Chinese people and once again declares himself ready to engage in dialogue with the Chinese authorities in the awareness that normalization of the life of the Church in China presupposes frank, open and constructive dialogue with these authorities. Furthermore, Benedict XVI, like his Predecessor John Paul II before him, is firmly convinced that this normalization will make an incomparable contribution to peace in the world, thus adding an irreplaceable piece to the great mosaic of peaceful coexistence among peoples.
My Religious Faith
By Chiang Kai-shek
A radio broadcast, originally entitled “Why I Believe In Jesus,” delivered to Chinese Christian throughout the land on Easter eve, April 16, 1938
One who wishes to succeed in his work, especially one engaged in a revolutionary task, must be free from superstition and yet he must be a man of faith. Especially today, when the evil passions of men are running riot, do we need a firm faith in the ultimate triumph of right. Our country is now being torn asunder; our fellow countrymen are suffering untold agonies; our men are being massacred, and our women are being ravished. The very existence of our nation is threatened. How can we avert except by faith? Therefore, while we must eradicate all superstitions, we must at the same time cultivate a strong and positive faith. For example, if we believe with all our hearts that the San Min Chu I (Three Principles of the People) are essentially true and just principles, then we shall have the power to put them into effect, and our enemies will never be able to conquer us, no matter how fierce and cruel they may become. Fearlessness and confidence have their roots in an unshakable faith.Tomorrow is Easter Sunday. This evening I have been asked by the National federation of Chinese Christians to speak to my fellow-Christians throughout the country. I propose to follow my talk of last year with a further testimony on the subject, “Why I Believe in Jesus.”To my mind the first reason why we should believe in Jesus is that He was the leaser of a national revolution. At the time of Jesus’ birth the Jewish people were steadily weakening under the heavy oppression of Rome. If we study the history of this period we find that the Jews were treated like slaves and animals at the hands of their enemies. The Romans has power of life and death over them. The Jews had not only failed to resist the aggressors, but they had even lost the will to resist. Then a people’s revolutionist was born in the person of Jesus, who courageously took upon Himself the heavy task of regenerating the nation. With sacrificial determination He set out to save His people, the world, and all mankind. He took His disciples on many itineraries, and by means of His preaching and healing, His Heaven-given wisdom and matchless eloquence, and His three ideals of truth, righteousness, and abundant life, He aroused the nation, led the masses, and prepared the way for a people’s revolution. The second reason why we should believe in Jesus is that He was the leader of a social revolution. The causes of a nation’s weakness are many. One of the most serious is the inability of the people to improve their living and economy and to put them on a rational foundation. Therefore, one engaged in a people’s revolution must begin by ridding society of its darkness and corruption, and then with fresh spirit create a new, expanding, abundant life for all the people, thus setting the nation free. Jesus fully realized that in order to revive His nation and regenerate His people He must launch a social revolution. He sought by the inspiration of His leadership and personality to awaken the perishing masses so that they would give up the ways of darkness, become new citizens, and build the foundations of a new society.In the third place, Jesus was the leader of a religious revolution. Jesus saw that unless there was a radical reform to sweep away the superstitions and corruption in the organized religion of His day, the real spirit of religion could not shine forth. Hence He often denounced those who prayed on the street corners, and strongly opposed the use of religion to exploit the people. All of His acts were designed to lead the Jewish religion from darkness to light, from decay to health, from chaos to order, from corruption to purity, and to lead society from the blackness of night in to the brightness of day. How important and yet how difficult was this task of reforming religion and of cleansing the religious society! Yet Jesus went ahead with utter disregard of personal suffering, in order that He might rescue religion and society from the evils that beset them and awaken the people from their spiritual lethargy.
I call Jesus a great religious revolutionist.I have often sought to study the secret of Jesus’ revolutionary passion. It seems to me that it is found in His spirit of love. With His wonderful love Jesus sought to destroy the evil in the hearts of men, to do away with social injustices, and to enable everyone to enjoy his natural rights as a human being and receive the blessings of liberty, equality, and happiness. He believed that all men are brothers and that they should love one another and help one another in need. He believed in peace and justice between nations. Throughout His life He opposed violence and upheld righteousness. He was full of mercy and continually helped the weak. His great love and spirit of revolutionary self-sacrifice were demonstrated in all His words and deeds. His purpose to save the world and humanity was firm and His faith was immovable. He gave Himself in utter love and sacrifice for others. He was absolutely fearless, and He struggled to the end. When He was nailed to the Cross and made to suffer unspeakable pain, He faced the ordeal with calm and fortitude. His loyalty to His cause and to His sense of duty, and his magnanimity to friends and associates were virtues as precious as they are difficult to attain. See Jesus lifted on the cross; He still looks to Heaven and pleads with God to forgive His enemies for their ignorance. What marvelous Love! Jesus’ revolutionary spirit came from His great love for humanity.If we compare the situation in China during the past few centuries when our national life degenerated under Manchu domination, we find that it was very similar to that occurring among the Jews under the rule of Rome. Our late leader, Dr. Sun Yat-sen, with his universal sympathy for all oppressed and his profound understanding of Jesus’ revolutionary spirit of Love and sacrifice, carried on his revolutionary work for forty years and brought about at last the liberation of the Chinese people. In 1911 he overthrew the autocratic Manchu Dynasty and established the Republic of China, thereby completing his mission of national revolution.As I look at the future of our Revolution I am convinced that we cannot truly regenerate our nation unless we have the spirit-the revolutionary spirit-of struggle and sacrifice such as we find in Jesus. I once said, “We will not abandon peace until all hope of peaceful settlement is gone; but when we reach the limit we will consider no sacrifice too costly.” This, I believe, reflected Jesus’ spirit. During the past five years, in addition to my regular duties, I have promoted several social movements. The best-known movement, and the one which has achieved some measure of success, is the New Life Movement. And yet I feel that this movement is apt to emphasize outward forms to the neglect of the inner substance, and to put more stress upon material than spiritual values. Where is the trouble? The answer is that many people are thinking only of new modes of living and not of a new quality of life. So I wish to give you this thought tonight: If we want to promote new ways of living, we must have not only a new spirit but also the quality of life that is inspired by the love and sacrificial purpose of Jesus.In conclusion, Jesus’ spirit is positive, sacrificial, sure, true, progressive, inspiring, and always revolutionary. We observe Easter this year at a time of grave national peril. Easter testifies to the immortality of Jesus’ spirit. We who share the Christian faith should treasure the Easter message of rebirth and resurrection. We should follow Jesus’ way of sacrifice. We should take His life as our example, His spirit as out spirit, His life as our life. Let us march together toward the Cross, for the regeneration of our nation and for the realization of everlasting peace on earth.
Monday, Apr. 26, 1943
Chiang Kai shek's Christian belief Testimony
The declaration of faith of Christendom's most famed living convert was made public last week by the Methodist Church. Chiang Kai-shek had written it in 1937, shortly after his capture and release by his Sian kidnappers. The hardboiled, stern Generalissimo, whose mother was a devout Buddhist, came under the influence of three powerful Christian influences in youth and early manhood—Dr. Sun Yatsen, "Mother" K. T. Soong and her daughter, Meiling. In 1930, three years after he had married the brilliant, Wellesley-educated Meiling, Chiang was baptized a Methodist, the faith of his wife and her family. But not until his captivity in Sian, by his testimony, did his religion become a part of himself, and thus a part of China. Christian Husband. Chiang had resisted threats of violence, torture and public trial from his captors. "From my captors I asked but one thing—the Bible. . . . The greatness and love of Christ burst upon me with a new inspiration, increasing my strength to struggle against evil, to overcome temptation and to uphold righteousness. . . . When Christ entered Jerusalem the last time He knew the danger ahead, but triumphantly He rode into the city. . . . "In comparison, how unimportant my life must be! ... I remembered the prayers offered by Dr. Sun Yat-sen during his imprisonment in London. . . .* My strength was redoubled and ... I was prepared to make the final sacrifice. ... I was comforted and at rest. . . . "The greatest thing [about Dr. Sun] was the love he received from Christ —love which sought the emancipation of the weaker races and the welfare of op pressed peoples. This spirit remains with us now and reaches to the skies. "Today I find that I have taken a further step and have become a follower of Jesus Christ. This makes me realize more fully than ever that the success of our revolution depends upon men of faith, men of character, who because of their faith will not sacrifice principle for personal safety. . . . "The life of Christ is a long record of affliction and persecution. His spirit of forbearance, His love and His benevolence shine through it all. No more valuable lesson has yet come to me out of my Christian experience. "Without religion there can be no real understanding of life. Without faith our human problems, great and small, are difficult of solution." Christian Wife. The Methodist Church also published the vivid and more emotional testimony of the Madame: "By nature I am not a religious person ... a mystic. I am practical minded. Mundane things have meant much to me . . . mundane, not material things. I care more for a beautiful celadon vase than for costly jewels. . . . Also I am more or less skeptical. ... I do not yet believe in predigested religion in palatable, sugar-coated doses. . . . "I know my mother ['Mother' Soong] lived very close to God. I recognized something great in her. And I believe that my childhood training influenced me greatly even though I was more or less rebellious at the time. ... I found family prayers tiresome. ... I hated the long sermons. But today I feel that this church-going habit established something, a kind of stability. . . . "During the last seven years I ... have gone through deep waters because of the chaotic conditions in China. ... All these things have made me see my own inadequacy. More than that, all human insufficiency. To try to do anything for the country seemed like trying to put out a great conflagration with a cup of water. "During these years of my married life . . . there was [first] a tremendous enthusiasm and patriotism. . . . But there was no staying power. I was depending on self. Then ... I was plunged into dark despair ... I realized that spiritually I was failing my husband. . . . Thus I entered into the third period where I wanted to do not my will, but God's. ... I used to pray that God would do this or that. Now I pray only that God make His will known to me. . . . "Prayer is not self-hypnotism. It is more than meditation. ... I do not think it is possible to make this understandable to one who has not tried it. ... What I do want to make clear is that whether we get guidance or not, it's there. It's like tuning in on the radio. There's music in the air whether we tune in or not."
* Where he was arrested in 1896 for extradition to China, apparently on the request of the Peking Government.WORDS OF WISDOM
In 1923, at the Edgewater Beach Hotel in Chicago, Illinois, eight of the most powerful money magnates in the world gathered together for a meeting one day. These eight, if they combined their total resources and assets, controlled more money than the U.S. Treasury. In that group were such men as Charles Schwab, the president of a steel company; Richard Whitney, the president of the New York Stock Exchange; Arthur Cutton, a wheat speculator; Albert Fall, a presidential cabinet member and personally a very wealthy man; Jesse Livermore, the greatest bear on Wall Street in his generation; Leon Fraser, the president of the International Bank of Settlements; and Ivan Krueger, who headed the largest monopoly. Quite an impressive and ambitious group of people!
Let's look at the same group of men later in life. Charles Schwab died penniless. Richard Whitney spent the rest of his life serving a sentence in Sing-Sing Prison. Arthur Cutton became insolvent. Albert Fall was pardoned from a Federal Prison so he might die at home. Leon Fraser committed suicide. Jesse Livermore committed suicide. Ivan Krueger also committed suicide. Seven of these eight ambitious money-magnates lived lives that ended in disaster before they passed on from this life. What mistake did they make? What led to their ruin? I think it was that their ambition was misplaced and they thought that happiness lay in the accumulation of wealth."Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal.
But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven....For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also" (6:19,20).
The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
WHAT IS A FSOC PROFESSIONAL?
A professional learns every aspect of the job. An amateur skips the learning process
whenever possible.
A professional carefully discovers what is needed and wanted. An amateur assumes what others need and want.
A professional looks, speaks and dresses like A professional. An amateur is sloppy in appearance and speech.
A professional keeps his or her equipment clean and orderly. An amateur has dirty gear.
A professional is focused and clear-headed. An amateur is confused and distracted.
A professional does not let mistakes slide by. An amateur ignores or hides mistakes.
A professional jumps into difficult assignments. An amateur tries to get out of difficult work.
A professional remains level-headed and optimistic. An amateur gets upset and assumes the worst.
A professional persists until the objective is achieved. An amateur gives up at the first opportunity.
A professional produces more than expected. An amateur produces just enough to get by.
A professional produces a high-quality product or service. An amateur produces medium-to-low quality product or service.
OPERATION FREEASIA
FREEASIA EMAIL
mailto:asiantigers@hotmail.com